Key Highlights
- Bengaluru holds 1,080 or more GCC units and a third of India’s GCC workforce. Companies choose it over other cities for reasons such as cost, sector, or a specific talent need.
- Chennai has fewer centres than Hyderabad but more people in them. The average centre there has about 816 professionals, the largest of the six cities.
- A tier-2 city like Coimbatore or Kochi costs less on every line. Rent runs roughly a third of tier-1, salaries 15 to 20 per cent lower, and attrition 8 to 12 per cent against 22 to 28 per cent.
- The trade-off is hiring speed and depth. Tier-2 roles take 45 to 60 days to fill, compared with 30 to 45 in a metro, and specialist skills are harder to find.
Two-thirds of new GCCs choose Bengaluru or Hyderabad. However, more than half the units set up over the last year were established in emerging cities such as Coimbatore, Ahmedabad, Kolkata, Vadodara and Kochi. The likeliest reading of the Nasscom–Zinnov India report is that the right city depends on the size and certainty of what you are building rather than on a ranking.
India hosts 2,117 Global Capability Centres employing 2.36 million professionals, making it the leading destination for GCCs across industries. With more centres and professionals than any other country, the question is no longer whether to set up in India; it is which Indian city suits the centre you are building.
The best cities to set up a GCC vary by sector, team size, and how long you expect to stay. If you are earlier than the city question and still deciding whether to build a centre at all, our [upcoming] page on what is a GCC and why India leads covers that ground first.
This page gives the six cities with their numbers, the emerging cities with theirs, and one figure nobody else publishes: the average size of a centre in each city, which tells you whether a city attracts many small teams or fewer large ones.
WorkEZ operates 13 centres across Chennai, Bengaluru, Coimbatore and Kochi, which covers one of the top three GCC cities in India and two of the five named emerging cities.
Which are the top GCC cities in India in 2026?
Six cities: Bengaluru, Hyderabad, NCR, Pune, Chennai, and Mumbai carry almost the entire market, and they are not close to each other in size. Bengaluru holds more than twice the units of the next city and roughly a third of all GCC talent in the country.
City | GCC units | Installed talent | Share of talent | Average centre |
Bengaluru | 1,080+ | 803,040 | 34% | ~743 people |
Hyderabad | 515+ | 306,800 | 13% | ~596 people |
NCR | 490+ | 236,000 | 10% | ~482 people |
Pune | 475+ | 283,200 | 12% | ~596 people |
Chennai | 405+ | 330,400 | 14% | ~816 people |
Mumbai | 375+ | 259,600 | 11% | ~692 people |
Read the table by column, and you get two different rankings:
- By unit count, the order is Bengaluru, Hyderabad, NCR, Pune, Chennai, Mumbai.
- By average size, it is Chennai, Bengaluru, Mumbai, Hyderabad, Pune, NCR.
A city that ranks third on one and fifth on the other is telling you something about the kind of centre that goes there.

If the city is settled and the headcount is roughly known, the next question is which floor. In Chennai alone, there were 18 fitted modules available across six centres in September 2026, from 16 seats to 175, and 13 of them could be occupied immediately.
Why is Bengaluru still the GCC capital of India?
Because of depth, and depth is the one thing any other city will find hard to compete against. Bengaluru holds 1,080 or more units and 803,040 GCC professionals, which is more than Hyderabad, Pune, and NCR combined.
The practical value of that depth is replacement. When a lead engineer leaves a centre in Bengaluru, there is a queue of people who have done the same job at a comparable company. That is what a mature GCC ecosystem buys, and it matters more than salary tables suggest, because the cost of a vacancy in a critical role is rarely counted in a business case.
The cost of that depth is also real. Bengaluru carries the highest attrition and the highest rents of the six cities, and the competition for tech talent is fiercest there because every other global capability centre is hiring from the same pool. It is also the hardest city in which to retain top engineers for the same reason. Our office space for GCCs in Bengaluru page covers the property side of that.
What does Chennai’s GCC talent pool tell you that unit counts hide?
It tells you that Chennai attracts fewer centres and larger ones. Chennai has 405 or more units against Hyderabad’s 515, yet it holds 330,400 GCC professionals against Hyderabad’s 306,800. That works out to roughly 816 people per centre, the highest of the six cities.
Companies that choose Chennai tend to commit to it, staffing centres that run engineering or product ownership rather than a landing team. The engineering talent base drawn from Tamil Nadu’s technical colleges supports that, and so does the manufacturing and automotive presence that gives the city a different industry mix from the software concentration further west.
The city’s GCC footprint has therefore grown by depth rather than by count. That is an unusual shape for an evolving GCC market, and it is a useful corrective to reading unit counts on their own.
In Chennai you are more likely to sit alongside other large, established centres than alongside a floor of twenty-person teams, which affects who you hire from and who hires from you. Our managed office space in Chennai pages set out where our own centres sit in the city.
Where do Pune, NCR and Mumbai fit in India’s GCC landscape?
Each of the three is strong for a particular reason and weaker as a default. They are worth understanding as specialisms rather than as ranks.
City | The case for it | What to check before choosing it |
Pune | 475+ units and 283,200 professionals. Engineering and automotive depth, and proximity to Mumbai without Mumbai’s rents | Average centre size of about 596 suggests many mid-sized centres rather than a few anchor ones |
NCR, including Delhi | 490+ units, and the widest set of state incentives because Haryana and Uttar Pradesh compete for the same occupiers | The lowest average centre size of the six, at about 482, and the most fragmented geography across Gurugram, Noida and Delhi |
Mumbai | 375+ units and a second-place average centre size among the non-southern cities. Financial services headquarters and capital markets access | The highest occupancy cost in India, and the smallest unit count of the six despite the city’s size |
All three are established tech hubs, and cities across the north and west look to them the way southern cities look to Bengaluru.
However, on general talent depth, all three sit behind Bengaluru, and on commitment signals, they sit behind Chennai.

Chennai first, then Bengaluru, then Coimbatore, and now Kochi. That is two of the six cities holding most of India's GCC talent, plus two of the cities taking half the new units.
Are emerging GCC cities like Coimbatore and Kochi ready for a GCC yet?
GCCs in tier-2 cities are no longer unusual, and the GCC model that suits them is a stable, scale-oriented centre rather than an exploratory one.
Emerging cities hold 375 or more units between them, about 6 per cent of the total, and half the units established over the last year went to them.
Emerging city | GCC units | What it is known for |
Coimbatore | 60+ | The largest of the emerging cities. Engineering and manufacturing depth, textiles and pumps industries that produce technical graduates, and a functioning IT corridor |
Ahmedabad | 45+ | Gujarat’s policy support and GIFT City, which offers a distinct regulatory regime for financial services rather than a general GCC location |
Kolkata | 45+ | A large graduate output and the lowest occupancy costs among cities of its size |
Vadodara | 35+ | Engineering and process industry adjacency to Ahmedabad |
Kochi | 35+ | Kerala’s technology parks, a strong English-language talent base, and the lowest attrition reported among the group |
Counts for the emerging cities are from Dun & Bradstreet’s India GCC entity mapping for FY26, reported in the India GCC Index 2026.
WorkEZ operates in two of these five, Coimbatore and Kochi. Coimbatore, with 60 or more units, is not an emerging market in any meaningful sense any longer, and the presence of large professional services centres there has changed what a company can expect to find.
Our Coimbatore centres and our Kochi centre both exist because enterprise demand in those cities arrived before the commentary did.
How much cheaper is a tier-2 city, and what does the discount cost you?
A tier-2 city is cheaper on every line, and the discount is large enough to change a business case. It also buys you a smaller and slower hiring market, which is the part most pages leave out.
What you are comparing | Tier-1 cities | Tier II cities | What it means |
Grade A office rent | Benchmark | Roughly one-third of the tier-1 rate | The largest single saving, and it grows with the size of the floor |
Annual attrition rates | 22 to 28 per cent | 8 to 12 per cent | You replace a quarter of the team a year, or a tenth |
Salaries | Benchmark | 15 to 20 per cent lower | Real, and it compounds across a large team |
Time to fill a general IT role | 30 to 45 days | 45 to 60 days | Two extra weeks per hire, and longer for specialists |
Figures from CIEL HR’s tier-2 versus tier-1 GCC talent comparison, published July 2026 and updated August 2026. These are market ranges for illustration and are not WorkEZ pricing, which depends on the centre, the module, and the term.
These are city differences rather than total costs. Our upcoming page on the cost of running a GCC in India breaks a centre into eight cost lines and shows which of them the city decision actually moves.
Global companies looking mainly for scale therefore do well in these cities, and companies seeking narrow specialist skills often do not. That is the whole trade, and it is a question about your roles rather than about the city.
Our Coimbatore corridor guide covers what is actually available there.
A city is not chosen on cost. It is chosen on how certain the mandate is and how long the team will stay.
WorkEZ runs 13 centres across Chennai, Bengaluru, Coimbatore and Kochi.
Book a TourWhat does state GCC policy actually give you?
Some government incentives can help cover costs your GCC would already have to pay, such as setting up an office, hiring employees, or investing in technology. GCC setup in India now attracts state competition, so the same GCC setup can be worth materially more in one state than in another.
State | Target | What is on offer |
500 new GCCs and 350,000 jobs by 2029 | R&D grants up to INR 50 crore, rental reimbursement up to 50 per cent, EPF support, and a 45-day approval timeline | |
Tamil Nadu | Not stated as a headline target | Land cost incentives up to 50 per cent for up to 8 hectares, IP filing reimbursement, electricity tax exemption and training stipends, with an additional capital subsidy for tier-2 locations including Coimbatore |
400 new GCCs and 400,000 jobs | Capital subsidies, payroll assistance, R&D grants and interest subsidies, with a stated focus on AI | |
120 new GCCs by 2026 | Land subsidies, electricity benefits and employment-linked support | |
Haryana and Uttar Pradesh (NCR) | Not stated as a headline target | Land subsidies of 30 to 50 per cent, capital subsidies up to INR 25 crore, payroll reimbursement and stamp duty exemption |
150 GCCs and about 200,000 jobs by 2031 | A GCC policy is in draft and open for public feedback, not yet notified. |
Policy terms are from a comparative review of state GCC policies and, for Tamil Nadu, a summary of the state GCC policy. Read the notification before relying on any figure here.
How should you choose the right city for your GCC?
Answer three questions about your own centre, in this order, and the city usually falls out of the answers:
- How certain is the mandate? If the plan is approved and the headcount is known, a cost-led city becomes reasonable. If it is not yet approved, choose the city with the deepest talent pool, because an uncertain centre is more likely to change shape than to change address.
- How scarce are the skills? Count the specific roles, not the headcount. A centre of 200 generalists has very different city requirements from a centre of 40 specialists, and the second one is far more constrained.
- How long will you be there? A three-year horizon and a ten-year horizon justify different cities, because attrition and replacement cost compound over time while rent differences do not.
A general rule of thumb could be to anchor the scarce work in a metro and put the scalable work where it costs less and stays longer.
Where WorkEZ operates, and what that covers
WorkEZ runs 13 centres across four cities: Chennai, Bengaluru, Coimbatore and Kochi. It is one of the top three GCC cities in India, one of the six, and two of the five named emerging cities.
Those four cities cover most of what global enterprises and multinational companies ask us for, because a global capability center in South India is usually a choice between Bengaluru, Chennai and a lower-cost alternative, and we operate in all three kinds of locations.
What that looks like in practice is fitted modules of varying sizes available across centres, ranging from 16 seats to 175 and even more as you scale.
We have no presence in Hyderabad, Pune, NCR, Mumbai, or Ahmedabad. If your city decision lands on one of those, this page has done its job, and we are not the operator for that requirement.
Where we do operate, the delivery is the same in every city. A private floor built to your brief, handed over, fitted in 45 days, on one contract. Teams start from around 20 seats and expand inside the same network as they grow. Our enterprise office space and private managed offices pages set out the formats.
If the city is settled and the headcount is roughly known, book a tour with WorkEZ.
FAQs
Q. Which city is the GCC capital of India?
Bengaluru. It holds 1,080 or more GCC units and 803,040 GCC professionals, about 34 per cent of India’s GCC workforce, on the Nasscom–Zinnov India GCC Landscape 2026. No other city is close on either measure.
Q. Which Indian city has the largest GCC centres?
Chennai has the largest GCC centres. Dividing installed talent by unit count gives an average of about 816 professionals per centre there, ahead of Bengaluru at about 743 and NCR at about 482. This is our calculation from the Nasscom–Zinnov figures rather than a published statistic.
Q. Are tier-2 cities viable for a GCC?
Yes, for centres that need scale rather than scarce specialist skills. Half of all new GCC units over the last year were set up in emerging cities. Rent runs roughly a third of tier-1 and attrition is 8 to 12 per cent against 22 to 28 per cent, but roles take two weeks longer to fill.
Q. How much cheaper is a tier-2 city for a GCC?
Grade A office rent runs at roughly one-third of the tier-1 rate and salaries are 15 to 20 per cent lower, on CIEL HR’s July 2026 comparison. For an absolute figure, Chennai Grade A rent is about INR 78 per sq ft a month. These are market ranges for illustration and not WorkEZ pricing.
Q. Which is better for a GCC, Chennai or Hyderabad?
It depends on the sector. Hyderabad has taken half of all new BFSI GCC units and is the stronger choice for financial services. Chennai holds more GCC professionals in fewer centres and suits companies building a single large engineering or product centre.
Q. Do the figures on this page reflect WorkEZ pricing?
No. Every cost figure here is a published market range or a calculation from published data, included to show how cities differ. WorkEZ pricing depends on the centre, the module, and the term, and is quoted against a specific requirement.
Q. How is AI changing which city a GCC should choose?
AI work concentrates where senior research and platform talent already sits, which pushes against cost. India holds more than 506,000 AI and machine learning professionals, and they are not evenly spread across Indian cities, so an AI city premium is emerging: the places that can staff a research team were already the expensive ones.
GCC success on an AI-heavy mandate depends more on which city can fill the first ten senior roles than on what the floor costs, and most companies end up splitting the work across two cities.
